Thursday, October 28, 2010

Assessing and Evaluating-- or, why I will never teach

In this chapter, Williams describes exactly the confusion I face when I read over my peers' papers or when I attempt to write one myself. Sadly, the first thing I consider as a student is usually the professor-- do I know the professor? what does she/he like? will she/he allow me to resubmit this for a better grade?

As a professor, however, I do not know how I would grade writing reliably so that it would be "consistent across evaluators and across time" (304). To me, this seems like a lot of pressure. Before reading this chapter, I assumed that, if by chance I do become an English teacher down the road, I could simply form my own "taste" for writing and grade accordingly. After all, this is how I have learned to write-- with evaluators and their different tastes in mind first and foremost. Williams calls this type of behavior out in Chapter 16, and he has made me glad once again that I am not pursuing a career in education. My assumptions about teaching were all wrong. And I had a feeling they were.

Another aspect of teaching that Williams points out, and that I am glad to avoid, is the workload. I have recently dug through a bunch of my papers I have written throughout college, and I have found exactly the types of comments Williams describes on page 315: little comments scribbled in the margins, then a paragraph at the end that seems to begin in a celebratory tone-- stating the positives of my paper-- and then shift to a more constructive tone to describe my weaknesses.

Overall, I found that Williams once again spends the majority of this chapter's pages to tearing down the traditional writing pedagogy with which I am most familiar. He then proceeds to offer research supporting his claims, and then he finally offers better methods for assessing and evaluating writing. I must admit that I like his suggestions for improvement. I was glad to see that I have experienced some of these improved methods in several classes. I like the idea of universal grading for writing, and I believe that Williams's suggestions could steer future teachers toward a reliable scale.

1 comment:

D.W. Sipes said...

I think on the base level as to why I would consider this blog successful is the fact that it does not rely on regurgitation. The idea most students (including myself at times) consider is, "why does my professor like? Will this meet their standards of excellence?" Your blog has a clear voice that provides the reader with a personal connection to you. Instead of dry summary, you provide personal testimony and inquiry.